[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Jun 19 21:20:53 PDT 2014


On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:35:10PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> The general thrust of your argument is that typography should be normative.

I don't think that was the thrust of my argument, at all.  Anyway, it
wasn't the intention.  I think Nico made all the arguments I would
have liked to, only more eloquently, elsewhere in this thread.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list