[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?
mellon at fugue.com
Thu Jun 19 08:12:07 PDT 2014
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:05 AM, Thomas Clausen <ietf at thomasclausen.org> wrote:
> I have to jump in and support Chris here — whatever you say the IESG has discussed recently, and whatever consensus has been expressed by the IESG recently, ADs have in the past — both long past and very recent past — raised must/MUST should/SHOULD issues in their reviews.
> Some ADs, over the years, very energetically so, even.
> It may not be official policy, of course. But it happens. Often - systematically, even.
You do have to be clear. If I have to ask whether language is normative or not, I will.
More information about the rfc-interest