[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?
Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
rse at rfc-editor.org
Thu Jun 19 07:50:58 PDT 2014
On 6/19/14, 7:47 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
> They are linked. It's not unreasonable to say "fine if it's something easy like &must; or <must/>, but not fine if it's something cumbersome like <span class='rfc2119'>MUST</span>".
> (There are of course intermediates like <keyword>MUST</keyword>.)
Both require changes to the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary and add requirements
to the code that needs to be written, so what we're looking for are the
use case(s) to determine if doing this is a Good Thing.
More information about the rfc-interest