[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) rse at rfc-editor.org
Thu Jun 19 07:31:20 PDT 2014


On 6/19/14, 6:21 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> 
> On 6/19/14, 3:10 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
>> If we mark up the 2119 words, it's trivial to change how they look using CSS or in the XML-to-text conversion.
>>
> 
> Sure.  I guess what I'm asking is whether we this is a discussion about
> how or whether we will mark up 2119 keywords.  If it's how, then as
> someone who writes drafts, I can live with <must /> or &must.

To be clear, the question is whether to mark up 2119 keywords.  How to
do it is a different conversation; interesting, but different.

-Heather



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list