[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu Jun 19 06:10:20 PDT 2014
On 6/19/14, 12:54 AM, "Eliot Lear" <lear at cisco.com> wrote:
>Backing up, isn't the high level question how best should normative 2119
>keywords be called out to the reader who hasn't been doing this for half
>a lifetime? Will there be other uses of bold or italics or underline as
>we go forward? How will the reader distinguish
> 2119 keywords from other words? If we're not going to embolden,
>italicize or underline 2119 keywords, are we going to allow that sort of
>markup for other words?
If we mark up the 2119 words, it's trivial to change how they look using
CSS or in the XML-to-text conversion.
More information about the rfc-interest