[rfc-i] Comments in the canonical RFCs
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 13:07:02 PDT 2014
On 11/05/2014 10:56, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> On 5/9/14, 6:48 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
>> On 10/05/2014 04:18, Nico Williams wrote:
>>> Any comments in the canonical XML should not relate to whatever is
>>> being specified. That leaves very little to comment about, mostly
>>> xml2rfc-related matters:
>>> <!-- the following is a hackish way to get this table to look right! -->
>> I agree. Comments on the content are inappropriate, but comments
>> on the production process may have value. I don't think a blanket
>> removal is a good idea.
> That's not possible to automate. I don't want to add manual editorial
> process. Either we should allow comments in the published version or
> disallow them.
This has been niggling at me. How about allowing:
<!-- EDITOR: the following is a hackish way to get this table to look right! -->
but no comments that are not addressed to EDITOR.
More information about the rfc-interest