[rfc-i] Host names and ownership of the XML coverter
Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
rse at rfc-editor.org
Mon Jun 2 03:09:05 PDT 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 6/2/14, 3:03 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-06-02 11:18, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>> On 5/28/14, 8:38 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>> On May 28, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon at nominum.com> wrote:
>>>> I've never understood why we were using the xml.resource.org domain--it
>>>> doesn't really make any sense, because "xml" is way too generic.
>>>> So I don't think there's any value in continuing to use it. I
>>>> think the rfc-editor.org/ietf.org split makes a lot of sense,
>>>> iff the RSE agrees.
>> Hosting the tools somewhere in the ietf.org domain makes sense; it more
>> accurately reflects the usage pattern and support model. The
>> bibliographic data, however, I'd very much like to see hosted at
>> rfc-editor.org. I think it makes more sense for the RFC Editor to
>> maintain that set of information than for the IETF to do so.
> Are you going to maintain them for Internet Drafts, W3C specs, etc, as
I would prefer that we (RFC Editor) did so and I think it makes sense,
but I have to make sure we have the resources to take it on.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rfc-interest