[rfc-i] Host names and ownership of the XML coverter
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Jun 2 03:03:42 PDT 2014
On 2014-06-02 11:18, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> On 5/28/14, 8:38 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On May 28, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon at nominum.com> wrote:
>>> I've never understood why we were using the xml.resource.org domain--it
>>> doesn't really make any sense, because "xml" is way too generic.
>>> So I don't think there's any value in continuing to use it. I
>>> think the rfc-editor.org/ietf.org split makes a lot of sense,
>>> iff the RSE agrees.
> Hosting the tools somewhere in the ietf.org domain makes sense; it more
> accurately reflects the usage pattern and support model. The
> bibliographic data, however, I'd very much like to see hosted at
> rfc-editor.org. I think it makes more sense for the RFC Editor to
> maintain that set of information than for the IETF to do so.
Are you going to maintain them for Internet Drafts, W3C specs, etc, as well?
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest