[rfc-i] xml2rfc media type and versioning
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Wed Jan 29 07:14:46 PST 2014
On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:39 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-01-29 10:36, Erik Wilde wrote:
>> sounds like a good starting point. the question then is whether for a v3
>> processor, there's some signal that it can use to branch into v2 or v3
>> behavior, or whether it can simply process v2/v3 in the same way. from
>> what i've heard so far, the latter seems to be the goal, but it may be
>> tricky if things such as v3 lists are using markup structures that are
>> rather different from their v2 counterparts.
> I believe it should be possible to do all changes in a way such that the semantics of existing markup will not change.
Note that there are many people (see the "lists" thread) that disagree with this approach.
More information about the rfc-interest