[rfc-i] Current Cacheing behavior for current XML2RFC
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed Jan 8 20:07:45 PST 2014
I strongly agree with Julian. Even if we happen to be in a minority, I'd
note that adding tool support is a volunteer effort, so anybody (even a
minority) can contribute.
[Unfortunately, I don't have the time to volunteer myself, and on top of
that face the handicap to prefer Ruby over Python :-(.]
On 2014/01/08 20:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 02:46, Jim Schaad wrote:
> I continue to believe is that using out-of-document references simply is
> a bad idea; it causes all kinds of trouble, such as failures in absence
> of a network connection, or silent changes that don't get checked properly.
> What would be much more useful is to have an automated way to check
> in-lined references, such as with
> or an xml2rfc-aware variant of id-nits.
> That being said, I realize this is a minority opinion :-)
> Best regards, Julian
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest