[rfc-i] On blockquotes and notes for v3

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Feb 25 12:48:02 PST 2014


On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon at fugue.com> wrote:

> On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
>> We could, but everyone writing a draft will use <note> instead of <bodynote> to make a note and then get errors. Expanding the semantics is backward compatible with v2 and will cause the least surprise to people writing in v3.
> 
> Getting errors is okay.  

Why, if they are unnecessary? We're supposed to be making the writing experience better.

What downside do you see to the proposal of expanding <note>?

--Paul Hoffman


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list