[rfc-i] On blockquotes and notes for v3
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Mon Feb 24 08:58:31 PST 2014
On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
> I do want an explicit quote/cite mechanism, yes.
> I'd also like a way to get specific as to what's being cited (RFC1234 section 2.3, second paragraph; URL fragment) but that's less important.
> The specifics of what the schema then looks like are less important to me. But yes, what you describe works for me, except I'd rather nest t/blockquote elements than indicate indentation as an attribute, and I'd really rather not express outdentation as an attribute.
When you say "I'd rather nest t/blockquote elements than indicate indentation as an attribute", do you mean that you want <blockquote> to be automatically indented and someone cannot use an attribute on <t> to indicate indentation? If so, wouldn't that cause people who want to indent a paragraph like a note to mis-use <blockquote>? Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying about what you want from <t>?
More information about the rfc-interest