[rfc-i] DTD defaults for v3
tony at att.com
Sun Feb 23 15:26:32 PST 2014
On 2/23/14, 2:07 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> So we need to decide what our position with respect to DTDs is...
> Julian and I just discovered that one of the useful patterns we want in the RNG schema will not translate to DTD. At this point, I would like to declare that v3 does not use a DTD at all. Are there any objections?
I'm not one bit surprised; the DTD language is rather limited.
And no, I have no objections.
More information about the rfc-interest