[rfc-i] vspace in v3

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Mon Feb 17 13:35:28 PST 2014


On Monday, February 17, 2014, Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 2/17/2014 12:59 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> For v3, "page break" makes no sense because the canonical format has no
>> pages. For "line break", I suspect <artwork> and <t> will be fine.
>>
>
>
> There is nothing wrong with having a canonical format also permit carriage
> of constructs that work (and are useful) for some derived formats but not
> others.  It's not as clean as anyone would like, but it is often practical.
>

+1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20140217/f8ed9de3/attachment.htm>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list