[rfc-i] Proposed way forwards on backward compatibility with v2
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Feb 17 13:09:31 PST 2014
On 2014-02-17 21:31, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> Exactly what are the cases where vspace can't be replaced with something
> Lists three cases:
> - line break
> - page break
> - list item paragraph break
> All three can be replaced with better first-class elements.
> I suppose additional uses might have to do with pagination relative to
> floating elements.
>> Assuming it is allowed in enough places, <artwork> can replace many uses of
>> vspace where blankLines is > 1, and maybe when blankLines=1.
>> It is a bit more troublesome when blankLines==0.
> I'm not sure why we should need an explicit line-break anywhere. But
> we could have a <br> if we did need it.
For instance, when trying to format a "contributors" section; another
thing we'll should address separately.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest