[rfc-i] DTD defaults for v3
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Sat Feb 15 08:06:20 PST 2014
On Feb 15, 2014, at 6:24 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> That's why DTD defaults are a bad thing; the infoset of the document varies depending on whether you use a validating parser or not.
. . .
>> Change the dtd so that the align attribute on artwork is implicit.
> That's a good change as well. We should do that consistently for all attributes.
For the v3 document, I have been keeping the defaults from the v2 document, and even adding in some new ones. Would it be better to remove them? Or am I misunderstanding your comments above?
More information about the rfc-interest