[rfc-i] DOIs and RFCs
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Feb 13 10:06:40 PST 2014
On 2/13/2014 9:40 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> We've spent a lot of time arguing about canonical output formats in
> the past, and really, I'm not sure why. All supported output formats
> for which output was reviewed and approved by the RFC-Editor and the
> authors should be canonical.
You seem to be misunderstanding the definition and purpose of a
In any event, my comment about allowing the citation convention to
specify a particular format to retrieve has nothing at all to do with
the debate on canonical formats.
More information about the rfc-interest