[rfc-i] DOIs and RFCs

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Feb 13 10:06:40 PST 2014


On 2/13/2014 9:40 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> We've spent a lot of time arguing about canonical output formats in
> the past, and really, I'm not sure why.  All supported output formats
> for which output was reviewed and approved by the RFC-Editor and the
> authors should be canonical.


You seem to be misunderstanding the definition and purpose of a 
canonical format.

In any event, my comment about allowing the citation convention to 
specify a particular format to retrieve has nothing at all to do with 
the debate on canonical formats.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list