[rfc-i] Update to the v3 format document: draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-01

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Wed Feb 12 12:12:59 PST 2014


On Feb 12, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> I suspect that someone who just wants to write an Internet draft would prefer the first.

This is a _very_ small optimization, though.   Adding an extra pair of <t> tags will be the least of their XML woes if they manually edit the XML (as I do, so I know whereof I speak).



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list