[rfc-i] References for non-standards
yaronf.ietf at gmail.com
Wed Feb 12 09:55:31 PST 2014
Sorry, I used "XMLbib" instead of "bibxml" (a.k.a. the <reference>
format). The Github link has a "tests" directory with a number of test
cases, which the Python script converts into <reference> entries.
Different bibtex databases are not very consistent, so the results are
quite basic - not all bibtex fields appear in the output.
If you could create a usable conversion service from it, that would be
And then, what kind of syntax should I use to include one or two such
bibtex entries from my draft? Can I do something like:
On 02/12/2014 05:11 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...or maybe a service that can translate bixtex to <reference>s?
>> Some time ago I created a simple Bibtex-to-XMLbib conversion utility
>> (https://github.com/yaronf/bibtex2rfc) which can be adapted to implement
>> this kind of functionality.
> See :-)
> I'd prefer the vocabulary to have a single way to express references.
> Instead, we should improve the tool. If you can send me a set of XMLbib
> examples, I'll try to come up with a conversion utility.
> Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest