[rfc-i] DOIs and RFCs
touch at isi.edu
Tue Feb 11 20:49:54 PST 2014
> On Feb 11, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 2/11/2014 7:40 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>> I similarly don't think its useful to include DOIs as part of citations.
>>> >"RFC" is a local namespace, with no formalized global anchoring.
>> Just like DOIs are meaningless without a dereferencing URL.
> I'm impressed with having this kind of exchange in the middle of a standards group that has created a number of international conventions for global, rather than relative, references.
I'm impressed that one URL is considered more global than another.
> And in case anyone thinks that this exchange is fresh and insightful:
More information about the rfc-interest