[rfc-i] On backwards compatibility for v2

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Mon Feb 10 15:39:32 PST 2014


On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
> You really don't see the basic flaw in your logic, from sentence 2 to sentence 3?  Really?

What, that we can ensure compatibility in the implementation through hard work and careful testing?   Sure, but we can also ensure compatibility in the implementation of the converter in the same way.



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list