[rfc-i] On backwards compatibility for v2
dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Feb 10 12:51:18 PST 2014
On 2/10/2014 12:39 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> I see nothing wrong with: "use the v2 tool for formatting docs in the
> v2 schema, use the v3 tool for formatting docs in the v3 schema, use
> the v3 schema for all new docs". The users here can handle that.
No. That's an inappropriate requirement, when growing a system, and it
has a long history of coming back to bite folks in the ass.
>> So I suggest declaring backward compatibility an explcit requirement, just
>> so no one else gets confused.
> I'd rather have a wart-less, clean v3.
It's true that the real world is ugly and awkward.
>> Might even want to say that the conversion tool is for those who happen to
>> want to upgrade, but that it isn't required.
> If you have an explicit backwards-compat requirement why should there
> be a conversion tool?
I'm a bit confused about that too.
More information about the rfc-interest