[rfc-i] List aesthetics and run-on numbering

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Apr 22 08:13:51 PDT 2014

On Apr 21, 2014, at 8:25 PM, Tony Hansen <tony at att.com> wrote:

> The other aspect of groupings that we currently have with the v2 processor is being able to specify the format of the grouped bullet, such as a prefix and suffix to the numbering. For example, a number of RFCs use a format of something like
>    Req. %d -
> When combined with the v2 equivalent of names, this produces "bullets" of
>    Req. 1 -
>    Req. 2 -
>    Req. 3 -
>    etc.
> This is not possible with the current v3 definition.

Either you are mistaken, or the document is not sufficiently clear. See Section 2.35.3.

<ol style="Req. %d -">

--Paul Hoffman

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list