[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-flanagan-nonascii-01.txt

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Mon Apr 21 20:22:49 PDT 2014

On Sunday, April 20, 2014, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
> Perhaps we should. But people who still can be reached should be easy to
> find, and people who can't be reached anymore won't be reached better with
> such a mechanism. We have been able to do without such a mechanism for
> close to 30 years. When there were serious problems to reach an author, I
> don't think the above would have helped substantially.

The TLS resumption bug involved me getting contacted over its impact on
RFC5929.  My co-authors were able to contact me, of course.  Bit for that
I'm not sure the discoverers would have tried hard enough.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20140421/08ce2f83/attachment.html>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list