[rfc-i] "vanity" reference anchors
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Apr 18 00:05:25 PDT 2014
On 2014-04-18 08:00, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> As long as the whole input and output is ASCII only, then yes.
> But once we go beyond that, why should it be impossible to use a
> reference anchor of e.g. [Fältström99] for a document that Patrik
> Fältström wrote in 1999?
It's something the RSE needs to decide; right now I have big doubts that
she would be ok with that.
If you believe this should be allowed, you should provide feedback to
the "non-ASCII" draft.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest