[rfc-i] "vanity" reference anchors
tony at att.com
Thu Apr 17 07:49:27 PDT 2014
On 4/17/14, 9:12 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-04-17 15:05, Tony Hansen wrote:
> > ...
> > I'm not sure how useful case 1 is, but don't mind it. A list of
>> maintained in a separate file can be expanded into the <references>
>> section as easily as getting expanded into the <rfc> section.
> Yes, but there could be multiple <references> sections... It would be
> a bit strange if metadata in one of them affects the rendering of
> entries in another one...
Hmmm. How about in <back> then?
More information about the rfc-interest