[rfc-i] "vanity" reference anchors

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Apr 17 07:32:08 PDT 2014

On 4/17/2014 5:45 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> people frequently ask for "vanity" reference anchors (where the anchor
> is not the default, such as "RFC2616", but something more readable, like
> "HTTP").

Vanity?  I thought it was merely mnemonics?

I guess saying vanity is more memorable...


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list