[rfc-i] "vanity" reference anchors
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Apr 17 06:12:56 PDT 2014
On 2014-04-17 15:05, Tony Hansen wrote:
> I'm not sure how useful case 1 is, but don't mind it. A list of mappings
> maintained in a separate file can be expanded into the <references>
> section as easily as getting expanded into the <rfc> section.
Yes, but there could be multiple <references> sections... It would be a
bit strange if metadata in one of them affects the rendering of entries
in another one...
More information about the rfc-interest