[rfc-i] "vanity" reference anchors

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Apr 17 06:12:56 PDT 2014


On 2014-04-17 15:05, Tony Hansen wrote:
 > ...
 > I'm not sure how useful case 1 is, but don't mind it. A list of mappings
> maintained in a separate file can be expanded into the <references>
> section as easily as getting expanded into the <rfc> section.
> ...

Yes, but there could be multiple <references> sections... It would be a 
bit strange if metadata in one of them affects the rendering of entries 
in another one...




More information about the rfc-interest mailing list