[rfc-i] Inconsistency about the Chicago Manual Of Style in draft-iab-styleguide-02.txt
nico at cryptonector.com
Tue Apr 15 10:01:11 PDT 2014
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-04-15 06:59, Nico Williams wrote:
>> Do we need a <sentence/> (or <s/>) element to distinguish ambiguities
>> w.r.t. periods followed by whitespace?
> No, we don't. There are already workarounds using nbsp.
Yes, that works, it's effectively "two spaces" after sentence-ending periods.
> That being said: please by all means get rid of this.
"This" == nbsp? If that's what you mean, please don't get rid of it.
More information about the rfc-interest