[rfc-i] v3: <tindent> feedback

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Sun Apr 13 23:18:06 PDT 2014

On 2014-04-13 21:06, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> ...
>>>> It would be invalid.
>>> <t> is a block-level element. You said "The content model needs to contain block-level elements". Can you be more specific about what you meant for the elements that need to be able to be contained?
>> Essentially the same things that can be used inside <section>.
> <t> is allowed inside of <section>, but above you say <t> inside of <tindent> is invalid.
> ...

I was referring to the text content.

>>>>> Given that <tindent> and <blockquote> mess with the margins, and margins are extremely important visual cues, it seems safer to not let them enclose block-level items whose indentation also give cues.
>>>> Such as? Example?
>>> I gave an example above. Another would be
>>> <tindent>
>>> Here is a sentence.
>>> <ul>
>>> <li>Here is a bullet item.</li>
>>> </ul>
>>> Here is another sentence.
>>> </tindent>
>> Again, that would be invalid.
> <ul> is allowed inside of <section>, but here you say that <ul> inside of <tindent> is invalid.
> Your proposal makes no sense to me. Maybe someone else here can state it more understandably.

Once again, I want the content model be roughtly like <section>, not 
like <t>.

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list