[rfc-i] draft-iab-styleguide-02 on referencing STDs
dhc at dcrocker.net
Sun Apr 13 10:03:01 PDT 2014
On 4/13/2014 9:53 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> In the ~10 years that I've been working on IETF documents I have rarely
> seen a case where citing a STD or BCP actually had an advantage.
> Also, as one of then authors of a six-part spec that might eventually
> become a STD, I'd really like to understand how it's going to be
> referenced in the mid term.
There were good and reasonable intentions behind creating BCP and STD as
distinct numbering series, but they've proven to be only a hassle,
without any actual benefit. In the case of STD, it often mostly serves
to create confusion (when the listing is out of sync with the latest
More information about the rfc-interest