[rfc-i] Acknowledgements and Contributors as non-sections
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Apr 11 23:42:16 PDT 2014
On 2014-04-11 22:04, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 2014-04-11 18:05, Nico Williams wrote:
>>> I'm missing something. What's the problem with unnumbered sections?
>>> They can still have anchors. They can still be referenced from within
>>> the document as well as from outside. If xml2rfc can't generate said
>>> anchors or references, well, then it should learn.
>> Well, it's harder to reference them, in particular in the current (plain
>> text) format.
> Why? Instead of #section-<n> you'd have #<unnumbered-section-anchor>
> as the URI fragment.
But what would be in the plain text? Also, rfcmarkup wouldn't be able to
> Unnumbered sections would have to have user-defined anchors to be
> referenceable, something like:
> <section unnumbered="true" anchor="ackowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
>>> Unnumbered sections work just fine in other systems.
> LyX (and therefore LaTeX).
How do they treat interleaving numbered and unnumbered sections? Is this
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest