[rfc-i] Acknowledgements and Contributors as non-sections
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Fri Apr 11 09:32:35 PDT 2014
On Apr 11, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
> I'm missing something. What's the problem with unnumbered sections?
There are none.
> They can still have anchors. They can still be referenced from within
> the document as well as from outside. If xml2rfc can't generate said
> anchors or references, well, then it should learn.
> Unnumbered sections work just fine in other systems.
> I'd rather have unnumbered sections than untitled numbered sections/appendices.
Yep. But I also don't feel it is important that Acknowledgements and Contributors are unnumbered. Having a number or letter on those sections doesn't degrade them at all.
> If updating xml2rfc is out of the question, then sure, deprecating
> unnumbered sections and requiring explicit sections/appendices for
> acknowledgements/author sections would be a decent fallback.
I don't think anyone said it was out of the question. The real question is whether the change, as described in the document, is really needed or desired.
More information about the rfc-interest