[rfc-i] feedback on draft-iab-styleguide-02

Russ Housley housley at vigilsec.com
Fri Apr 11 06:27:38 PDT 2014

Paul and Julian:

>> Also, the format is very misleading. The erratum is not the RFC, so this
>> is a case where the notation deviates from what we use elsewhere.
>> Can we make it "RFC Erratum RFCXXXX-NNNN", so we can drop the "RFC NNNN"
>> entry?
> Please?

this would require a rework of the errata database and it would make the existing references to errata useless.  While I see the elegance in your proposal, I do not think it is work the pain of a change.  The current approach works without confusion.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list