[rfc-i] feedback on draft-iab-styleguide-02
housley at vigilsec.com
Fri Apr 11 06:27:38 PDT 2014
Paul and Julian:
>> Also, the format is very misleading. The erratum is not the RFC, so this
>> is a case where the notation deviates from what we use elsewhere.
>> Can we make it "RFC Erratum RFCXXXX-NNNN", so we can drop the "RFC NNNN"
this would require a rework of the errata database and it would make the existing references to errata useless. While I see the elegance in your proposal, I do not think it is work the pain of a change. The current approach works without confusion.
More information about the rfc-interest