[rfc-i] Reminder: xml2rfc v2 transition
tony at att.com
Sun Apr 6 10:21:58 PDT 2014
On 4/5/14, 4:16 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> It might be helpful to remind the populace of the ways in
> which v2 is more strict than v1. I also find that the web
> service at http://xml.resource.org/ is a little inscrutable
> about version numbers. It just says 'beta', and you have to
> poke around a bit to determine that it's v2. Then the phrase
> 'If you prefer to use the currently released version,...'
> leads you to v1. That's plain wrong.
I reworked the page at xml.resource.org a bit. Hopefully it's a bit
It's also now pointing at the current work being done on updating the v2
language description and the proposals for the v3 language updates.
More information about the rfc-interest