[rfc-i] Reminder: xml2rfc v2 transition

Tony Hansen tony at att.com
Sun Apr 6 10:21:58 PDT 2014

On 4/5/14, 4:16 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> It might be helpful to remind the populace of the ways in
> which v2 is more strict than v1. I also find that the web
> service at http://xml.resource.org/ is a little inscrutable
> about version numbers. It just says 'beta', and you have to
> poke around a bit to determine that it's v2. Then the phrase
> 'If you prefer to use the currently released version,...'
> leads you to v1. That's plain wrong.

I reworked the page at xml.resource.org a bit. Hopefully it's a bit 
clearer now.

It's also now pointing at the current work being done on updating the v2 
language description and the proposals for the v3 language updates.

     Tony Hansen

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list