[rfc-i] feedback on draft-iab-styleguide-01
pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu
Fri Apr 4 14:51:41 PDT 2014
On 4/4/14 4:52 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> I think that the entry should include both the RFC number and the errata number. Something like this:
>> [ErrNNNN] RFC Errata, Errata ID NNNN, RFC XXXX,
> It'd be even better if errata we named ErrRRRR-EEE, where RRRR is an
> RFC number and EEE is an errtum number relative to that RFC.
> I'll never remember erratum Err3527, but I will remember Err4301-000
> (if I care about errata for RFC4301).
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest