[rfc-i] feedback on draft-iab-styleguide-01

Paul Kyzivat pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu
Fri Apr 4 14:51:41 PDT 2014


How about:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX/erata/NNNN

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 4/4/14 4:52 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> I think that the entry should include both the RFC number and the errata number. Something like this:
>
> +1
>
>>       [ErrNNNN]  RFC Errata, Errata ID NNNN, RFC XXXX,
>>                  <http:/www.rfc-editor.orgerrata_search.php?eid=NNNN>.
>
> It'd be even better if errata we named ErrRRRR-EEE, where RRRR is an
> RFC number and EEE is an errtum number relative to that RFC.
>
> I'll never remember erratum Err3527, but I will remember Err4301-000
> (if I care about errata for RFC4301).
>
> Nico
> --
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list