[rfc-i] feedback on draft-iab-styleguide-01

Russ Housley housley at vigilsec.com
Fri Apr 4 13:56:58 PDT 2014


Nico:

>> I think that the entry should include both the RFC number and the errata number. Something like this:
> 
> +1
> 
>>     [ErrNNNN]  RFC Errata, Errata ID NNNN, RFC XXXX,
>>                <http:/www.rfc-editor.orgerrata_search.php?eid=NNNN>.
> 
> It'd be even better if errata we named ErrRRRR-EEE, where RRRR is an
> RFC number and EEE is an errtum number relative to that RFC.
> 
> I'll never remember erratum Err3527, but I will remember Err4301-000
> (if I care about errata for RFC4301).

The existing errata database assigns a unique positive integer to each errata.

Russ


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list