[rfc-i] feedback on draft-iab-styleguide-01

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Fri Apr 4 13:52:09 PDT 2014


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
> I think that the entry should include both the RFC number and the errata number. Something like this:

+1

>      [ErrNNNN]  RFC Errata, Errata ID NNNN, RFC XXXX,
>                 <http:/www.rfc-editor.orgerrata_search.php?eid=NNNN>.

It'd be even better if errata we named ErrRRRR-EEE, where RRRR is an
RFC number and EEE is an errtum number relative to that RFC.

I'll never remember erratum Err3527, but I will remember Err4301-000
(if I care about errata for RFC4301).

Nico
--


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list