[rfc-i] [Tools-discuss] Direction of the RFC Format Development effort

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Oct 15 13:52:00 PDT 2013


On 10/16/2013 9:42 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2013-10-15 22:30, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> ... It would be useful if the xml2rfc tool generated HTML in a way
>> that was not 'lossy'. If the tool generates <H1> headings rather
>> than <p> tags with style sheet links it is much easier to recover
>> structure. ...
>
> It does. Or am I missing something?


 From an xml2rfc draft I'm editing, here's the html produced through the 
oXygen processor:


> <h2 id="rfc.section.1.2"><a
> href="#rfc.section.1.2">1.2</a>&nbsp;Working Group Authority and
> Consensus</h2>
>
> <p id="rfc.section.1.2.p.1">A core premise of IETF working groups is
> that the working group has final authority over the content of its
> documents, within the constraints of the working group charter. No
> individual has special


Note that the header is second-level.  Doc also contains h1, of course.


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list