[rfc-i] RFCxx99 series should not be discontinued
housley at vigilsec.com
Thu Oct 10 09:30:03 PDT 2013
>> So instead of writing my references generator for RFCs so it pulls the
>> references out of the xml.resource.org <http://xml.resource.org> files
>> and caches them, I should allow folk to download the XML index and cache
>> that. It would eliminate most of the calls to resolve references.
> rfc-index.xml is missing information to create <reference> elements (dates and author name granularity come to mind).
Continuing to publish RFC xx99 will not solve this concern.
I would support updates too rfc-index.xml to include the information to build a complete reference.
More information about the rfc-interest