[rfc-i] Call for Comment: "RFC Format Requirements and Future Development"

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Fri Mar 1 12:58:40 PST 2013


On Mar 1, 2013, at 9:59 AM, t.p. <daedulus at btconnect.com> wrote:

> There should be an immutable requirement that any alternative format
> MUST NOT increase the size by more than a factor of two compared to
> ASCII text.

<tongue position="incheek">
Given Moore's law, would that change 18 months from now to an immutable requirement of a factor of four?
</tongue>

--Paul Hoffman


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list