[rfc-i] RFC 6234 code
John C Klensin
john-ietf at jck.com
Sat Jun 29 14:25:08 PDT 2013
--On Friday, June 28, 2013 16:41 -0400 Joe Abley
<jabley at hopcount.ca> wrote:
>> If you really think you see a legal difference in doing the
>> second, fine; I propose that you are just searching for
>> problems that do not exist.
> Quite possibly they don't, and I'm not presuming to talk for
> John. But the vague thoughts that crossed my mine were the
> issues that allowed Phil Zimmerman to publish PGP source code
> in book form and avoid conviction for munitions export without
> a licence.
That was one of the examples I had in mind, along with a few
However, given Paul's extensive legal experience and knowledge
of the details and applicability of export regulations and
associated case law, I apologize for wasting the time of people
on the list by raising this obviously spurious issue. I am
delighted that, on the basis of that knowledge and experience,
Paul was willing to step in on this issue and assure us that
there is nothing to worry about.
More information about the rfc-interest