[rfc-i] Something clearly needs to change (was: [IAB] RSOC Appointments)
sm at resistor.net
Tue Jun 25 15:05:09 PDT 2013
Hi Bernard, Eliot,
At 11:48 25-06-2013, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>Thanks for bringing this up. Over the last year it seems to have
>become harder to recruit candidates for many IETF roles. Re-running
>calls for candidates is becoming common - once, twice, even three
>times. This makes it difficult to meet a timeline for appointments,
>and turns recruiting into a continuous ongoing activity.
>Something clearly needs to change. New programs (e.g. Mentoring),
>new processes, new blood.
At 13:07 25-06-2013, Eliot Lear wrote:
>Indeed. Propose changes! We're all listening!
I should take this thread back to the SDO mailing list. I'll leave
it here. :-)
Having recruiting as a continuous ongoing activity means that you
have less time to do other work, or take a break. The problem is
that it is difficult to recruit candidates. My guess is that there
is a need for the short term and the long term. It is extremely
difficult to find candidates for the short term. :-( There hasn't
been any women  contributors on the rfc-interest mailing since a
long time. The IAB members I approached to help with mentoring were
helpful. The problem is spotting talent and encouraging them to
stay. It could be about having a venue where people can ask
questions, learn how things work, learn, for example, what the IAB
would like to see in a RSOC member.
As a first step I suggest reviving edu-discuss at . If you are going to
have a discussion which is not going to end up in some RFC, wikify
it. You can informally use the discussions and the Wiki to assess
the extent of contributions. Please note that this is not about who
is right or who has the last word, etc. (see Thomas Narten's comment).
As a note to Dave, it's not me; it's the team. I am really serious
about this. I am amazed by what each of you have done. Everyone has
helped in their own way and people have gone out of their way to help.
1. I am using women as an example.
More information about the rfc-interest