julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jan 17 00:53:11 PST 2013
On 2013-01-17 09:42, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I agree that we shouldn't be concerned about defective
> implementations of reflowable text. How about
> * Reflowable text cannot support graphics and tables
> that exceed the constraints of a given display device.
> (To which there's a counter-argument: 72 character fixed width
> text and ASCII art cannot be displayed readably on a wide variety
> of devices.)
Exactly: it's the same problem for non-reflowable text.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest