Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Wed Jan 16 12:10:10 PST 2013
On 1/16/13 12:15 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>I (still) don't get:
>> Arguments against allowing for reflowable text:
>> * Reflowable text may impact the usability of graphics and tables
>> within a document.
>Of course a format that allows reflowable text will need handle graphics
>and tables so that they display properly. Has anybody proposed a format
>that fails to do this?
>So it appears this is just an argument against doing reflowable text
>*wrong*; nothing that needs to be noted here.
More information about the rfc-interest