[rfc-i] Requirement for "clear printing"
mellon at fugue.com
Tue Feb 19 08:25:14 PST 2013
On Feb 19, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> I have my doubts about "easy to accomodate". Right now, the RFC Editor spends time to optimize vertical whitespace for page breaking in text/plain. I think it would be good to get rid of this waste of time.
Or use a text processing utility that supports widows, orphans and unbreakable blocks, which one assumes we would want anyway for the reflowable version of the doc. I'm pretty sure LaTeX does this; actually nroff does too, with the .ne primitive.
More information about the rfc-interest