[rfc-i] [IAB Trac] #266: Requirement for "Clear Printing"
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Mon Feb 18 09:13:37 PST 2013
On 2/17/13 1:17 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
>On 16/02/2013 22:49, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> Conversely, why should the canonical format be required to support page
>I think Ran already answered that - for unambiguous ease of reference
>(especially if a document happens to contain very long sections that
>span more than one page).
If you made the requirement "capability for fine-grained references", you
would be speaking requirements language instead of implementation language.
More information about the rfc-interest