[rfc-i] Allowing unnumbered t items in a list
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Dec 17 11:30:53 PST 2013
On 12/17/2013 11:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2013-12-17 19:49, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> On 12/17/2013 10:14 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> You are re-inventing the wheel; this was discussed a few years ago and
>>> we came to the conclusion that we want to support list item (<lt>)
>>> elements in addition to <t> elements. See thread around
>> I think the point of deviation to that construct is that the 'list' is
>> not indented.
very sorry. i hadn't known about <lt> and my eye skipped over your
reference to it in your original note.
yeah, that looks like it would handle the current case.
More information about the rfc-interest