[rfc-i] Remove some requirements on element order
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Tue Dec 17 00:18:20 PST 2013
On 2013/12/17 6:49, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> In v2, there are a few elements that require their sub-elements to be in a certain order even though that order isn't really needed by the XML processor. For example,<address> requires the enclosed<postal>,<phone>,<facsimile>,<email>, and<uri> elements be in exactly that order. Given that each sub-element has its own name, the order should not be important.
There are several questions here:
1) Is this the right and only order (of how these elements should appear
in (final) output), or do other orders make sense?
If we get a 'yes' here, then obviously we have to make this change, but
so far, things seem to have worked well with this fixed order.
2) Do we want to make it easier for the author(s), or easier for the
Currently, it's the author(s) who have to put things in the right order,
and the tools just copy things over. If we relax the order of input, but
we want to keep the order on output, the tools will have to do more work.
3) Do we want to allow more than one of each of the subelements?
With a DTD, allowing at most one of each is quite simple if the order is
fixed, whereas it's a *lot* of work if the order is open.
More information about the rfc-interest