[rfc-i] RFC Production Center request for unnumbered sections
elwynd at folly.org.uk
Thu Dec 12 06:03:48 PST 2013
If we go down the path of modifying the Section element then maybe we
should consider doing away with the Note element which behaves more or
less like the proposed unnumbered section but is currently only allowed
at the end of Front elements - but I guess that is not backwards
As an alternative to modifying the Section spec we could allow Notes at
the beginning and/or end of Font and Back.
Currently Notes don't appear in the ToC (mainly because they are before
the ToC I suspect). This could be be implicitly or explicitly
(toc="yes/no" attribute) modified for Notes later in the document.
How would an unnumbered section be referenced?
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:03 -0800, Alice Russo wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> I added http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/105 to the xml2rfc issuetracker at the request of the RSE because it has a tie-in with the future style guide, draft-flanagan-style.
> It's fine with me for it to be grouped with v3 vocabulary changes.
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> > The RFC PC has requested that this change be made in the v2 format.
> > Jim
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman at vpnc.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:54 AM
> >> To: Jim Schaad
> >> Cc: RFC Interest
> >> Subject: Re: [rfc-i] RFC Production Center request for unnumbered sections
> >> On Dec 11, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Jim Schaad <ietf at augustcellars.com> wrote:
> >>> The request springs from some of the changes that are being looked at
> > for
> >> how sections are done in the newer proposed format.
> >> That seems fine (but not yet reflected in the Wiki page for that format),
> > but it
> >> doesn't explain why you're trying to get it changed in the v2 format.
> >> --Paul Hoffman=
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest